A film review by Craig J. Koban March 30, 2011 |
||
|
SUCKER PUNCH
Emily Browning: Babydoll / Abbie Cornish: Sweet Pea / Jena Malone: Rocket / Vanessa Hudgens: Blondie / Jamie Chung: Amber / Oscar Isaac: Blue / Carla Gugino: Madam Gorski / Scott Glenn: Wise Man / Jon Hamm: High Roller Directed by Zack Snyder / Written by Snyder and Steve Shibuya |
||
Snyder, if
anything, may lack restraint in his films, but that’s precisely
what his previous efforts required. Reticent
filmmakers could have never gathered up the nerve to successfully
remake one of the most hallowed horror films of all time in 2004’s DAWN
OF THE DEAD, not to mention that it took balls the size of Dr. Manhattan
to helm one of the riskiest, most complex, and most potentially polarizing
comic book adaptations ever in 2009’s WATCHMEN.
Hell, even Snyder’s blood and gore-drenched period epic 3OO
displayed his prodigious talents for faithfully appropriating Frank
Miller’s splattergorium, swords and sandals graphic novel.
It takes singular endowment to handle these kinds of films with
just the right gutsy panache. SUCKER PUNCH just
may be Snyder’s most audaciously realized audio/visual nirvana yet.
The film, if anything, is a masterstroke of employing cutting edge
technological innovation and filmmaking wizardry to fully realize the
boundless sense of imagination that just pours out of every inch of the
screen. I find it difficult
to lambaste any film that throws caution to the wind and goes for it; just
consider what we are shown here: giant snakes, mankind hating cyborgs,
machine gun-wielding demonized samurai, salivating orcs and dragons, combat
against steampunk Nazi zombies in a pseudo-WWI hellscape, and, yes, hot
babes in bondage attire sporting ample physical assets while brandishing
enough firepower to fetishistically shoot their way out of anything.
SUCKER PUNCH is a materialized adolescent male pornographic fantasy
come to life, but it never hides behind that notion. The opening scene
of the film is arguably is finest, all presented with virtually no
dialogue and set against a haunting backdrop of eerie and gothic scenery and a
masterful juxtaposition of imagery
to tell a story of family tragedy in just a few scant minutes.
A young woman know later as Baby Doll (Emily Browning, whose rosy
cheeked complexion, intoxicatingly beautiful eyes, and porcelain
loveliness makes her a perfect physical embodiment of her role)
comes to grips with her mother’s death, but her new guardian seems to
relish at the notion of getting a large inheritance in the will.
When he doesn’t he goes on a frustrated and mad spree and
murders Baby Doll’s sister, but she is later accused of the murder and
is sent to Lennox House, an insane asylum. Since this is the 1960’s, it becomes glaringly clear that
this asylum’s methods of rehabilitation are anything but noble minded
and just. Baby Doll’s
future appears grisly, to say the least: she has to fend of the lecherous
Blue (oozing contemptuousness by Oscar Isaac), who has made a sickening
deal with her stepfather to forge a doctor’s signature to approve
lobotomizing her within five days in exchange for a large bribe.
Baby Doll is befriended by Madam Gorski (Carla Gugino, having a
ball vamping it up to enjoyable effect) a doctor and dance instructor that
teaches her girls how to deal with their current predicament by commanding
and taking control of their imaginations.
During Baby Doll’s first “session” she transports herself
into the world of her imagination, an alternate reality where she is now
an orphan sold to a 1950’s brothel where her and the other incarcerated
ladies perform for wealthy clients. It’s here where Baby Doll hooks up with three other
dancer/whores that she will become close allies with: Sweet Pea (Abbie
Cornish), her sister, Rocket (Jena Malone), Blondie (Vanessa Hudgens, a
far, far cry from HIGH SCHOOL MUSICAL) and Amber (Jamie Chung). As Madam G tries
to get baby Doll to dance for a high ranked client, she cognitively
transports herself to a new faux reality within the faux reality, this
time she is now in a Japanese dojo where she meets an old man (Scott
Glenn) who offers her a chance to secure her freedom.
He gives her weapons (a katana and a handgun) and instructs her to
collect five objects: a map, fire, a knife, a key, and a mysterious fifth
object that will only come to her when she is ready.
When Baby Doll returns to her previous dreamed reality, she pleads
with her new friends to join her on her quest, which they do, albeit
begrudgingly. From this point
onward,
the girls morph in and out of Baby Doll’s pseudo-realities to secure the
items required that, in turn, will allow them to become free…but only
before the so-called High Roller comes to make mince-meat out of Baby
Doll’s brain. SUCKER PUNCH is a
hyperactively offbeat and deviously conceived hodgepodge of films as far
ranging as MOULIN ROGUE (in the opening title cards alone), INCEPTION,
GIRL, INTERRUPTED, KILL BILL,
SHOWGIRLS, and any martial arts-infused anime flick of your choice.
The fantasies within fantasies that all occur within Baby
Boll’s mind are essentially the selling points of SUCKER PUNCH, and they
all are steeped in sumptuously mounted production design, exemplary and
lively CGI-artifice, and balls-to-the-wall action intrigue.
The creativity here is splendidly energized, meticulously stylized,
and exhilarating. I liked the
excursion the woman had to the nightmarish trenches of a re-imagined Great
War battlefield where Germans have been reduced to steam and clock powered
robotic ghouls. Then there is
an exciting fantasy sequence – echoing THE LORD OF THE RINGS in spades –
where Baby Doll and her companions mush slay a young dragon without waking
up its mother, which they fail miserably at. When the mother appears and unleashes her monster might on
the woman, they fight her off in WWII-era bombers.
Then there is the sci-fi fantasy dream state where the girls must
stop a ticking bomb on a train from reaching a futuristic city on a planet
that looks like a colonized moon outside of Saturn.
All of these sequences – albeit seemingly disconnected and
increasingly abstract – are all wonderfully absorbing and bizarrely
provocative romps through Snyder’s hellish bullets 'n broads version of ALICE
IN WONDERLAND. The production
values on SUCKER PUNCH are on bravura display and really pop
(especially without the need for the eye-gouging obtrusiveness of a 3D
upconversion; thanks, Zack!). Yet, as involved as I was in the visual texture and dynamism
of the film, SUCKER PUNCH is negligible on an emotional and dramatic front.
The script itself (from Snyder and Steve Shibuya) is fiercely ambitious, but
lacks proper embellishment and development.
Baby Doll’s entourage of tough talking and bad- assed female
warriors are performed well but the actresses, but as characters they are
poorly established, being only typified by their sultry outfits and their
preferred method of killing. Emily
Browning, a luminous and capable actress, is woefully bland and one-note as
Baby Doll. Her eyes and lips
do most of the performing, which leaves a lot to be desired when it comes
to an actual persona vying for attention.
I certainly liked ogling at all of these women, but the script
rarely made me care for them. It’s
funny, but for all of the film’s pontificating on being about female
empowerment and girl power, SUCKER PUNCH indulges us more on a salacious
level viewing the females on display as objects to lust over. Hmmmm...I
don’t think you can have it both ways. Yeah, the film has other faults, like an ear-splittingly punishing hard rock score that uses cover songs and haphazardly jumbled up tunes; perhaps Snyder’s intention here was to comment on the maddening extremes of his film’s schizophrenic vision, but it more or less has the unintended side-effect of exhausting the viewer into a numbing sense of anxiety. Then there is the wimpy PG-13 rating of the film, which considering Snyder’s headfirst and unapologetic bravado he’s displayed in the past, seems like a desperately safe ploy for mass marketed consumption. SUCKER PUNCH, dare I say this, needs far more exploitative nudity, violence, sex, and overall crassness to match the inherent lewdness of the story. In the end, Snyder’s film is more imperfect, overlong, undisciplined, and convoluted than it is a calamitously awful misfire of epic proportions worthy of multiple Razzie nominations. There are components that I greatly admired in SUCKER PUNCH; it’s just that the bowl they were mixed in lacked other integral ingredients to make it a successful whole. |
||
|
||